<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cipher Mysteries &#187; The Subtelty of Witches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ciphermysteries.com/category/historical-ciphers/the-subtelty-of-witches/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com</link>
	<description>The latest news, views, research and reviews on uncracked historical ciphers...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:45:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Ancient Cryptography&#8221; forum&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/10/28/ancient-cryptography-forum</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/10/28/ancient-cryptography-forum#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beale Ciphers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D'Agapeyeff Cipher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dorabella Cipher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Subtelty of Witches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Gaffney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zodiac Killer Ciphers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tony Gaffney, a chess player / tournament organizer I knew back in the early 1980s when playing for Hackney Chess Club, made some fascinating comments to my recent blog post on The Subtelty of Witches and Eric Sams&#8217; attempted solution to the Dorabella Cipher. Firstly: having spent a looong time in the British Library looking at ciphers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Tony Gaffney, a chess player / tournament organizer I knew back in the early 1980s when playing for Hackney Chess Club, made some fascinating comments to my recent blog post on The Subtelty of Witches and Eric Sams&#8217; attempted solution to the Dorabella Cipher.
Firstly: having spent a looong time in the British Library looking at ciphers (you&#8217;ll [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/10/28/ancient-cryptography-forum/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BL cipher manuscript update&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/10/06/bl-cipher-manuscript-update</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/10/06/bl-cipher-manuscript-update#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 09:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dorabella Cipher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Subtelty of Witches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Sams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[musical times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just heard back from the British Library Manuscript department about BL MS Add. 10035, &#8220;The Subtelty of Witches&#8221;, which I mentioned here a few days ago: &#8221;unfortunately it does not begin in English. The whole of the manuscript is written in cipher.&#8221; So: was Eric Sams mistaken? Might the British Library actually have two unreadable books? Well&#8230; after [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just heard back from the British Library Manuscript department about BL MS Add. 10035, &#8220;The Subtelty of Witches&#8221;, which I mentioned here a few days ago: &#8221;unfortunately it does not begin in English. The whole of the manuscript is written in cipher.&#8221;
So: was Eric Sams mistaken? Might the British Library actually have two unreadable books? Well&#8230; after a [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/10/06/bl-cipher-manuscript-update/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British Library cipher manuscript&#8230;?</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/10/02/british-library-cipher-manuscript</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/10/02/british-library-cipher-manuscript#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Subtelty of Witches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Sams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you an historian with an enciphered document you want to read? If so, here&#8217;s a link to an article you really ought to have a look at: &#8220;Cryptanalysis and Historical Research&#8221; by Eric Sams, from Archivaria 21 (1985-1986) [it's actually an extended version of two earlier articles he wrote for the TLS in 1977 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Are you an historian with an enciphered document you want to read? If so, here&#8217;s a link to an article you really ought to have a look at: &#8220;Cryptanalysis and Historical Research&#8221; by Eric Sams, from Archivaria 21 (1985-1986) [it's actually an extended version of two earlier articles he wrote for the TLS in 1977 [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/10/02/british-library-cipher-manuscript/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

