<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cipher Mysteries &#187; Carlo Ginzburg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ciphermysteries.com/category/historians-of-note/carlo-ginzburg/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com</link>
	<description>The latest news, views, research and reviews on uncracked historical ciphers...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:09:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Secret History of That Which Is Secret&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/11/16/the-secret-history-of-that-which-is-secret</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/11/16/the-secret-history-of-that-which-is-secret#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carlo Ginzburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=2336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you accept the basic notion that the Voynich Manuscript is both (a) very probably a genuine (if perhaps rather convoluted) cipher, and (b) mostly rational, then you run into the issue of what kind of sensible stuff lies beneath &#8211; in other words, its &#8220;secrets&#8221;. All the same, how sure are we that our modern notion of &#8220;secrets&#8221; is anything [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you accept the basic notion that the Voynich Manuscript is both (a) very probably a genuine (if perhaps rather convoluted) cipher, and (b) mostly rational, then you run into the issue of what kind of sensible stuff lies beneath &#8211; in other words, its &#8220;secrets&#8221;. All the same, how sure are we that our modern notion of &#8220;secrets&#8221; is anything [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/11/16/the-secret-history-of-that-which-is-secret/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Dee&#8217;s &quot;Tuba Veneris&quot;&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/08/04/john-dees-tuba-veneris</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/08/04/john-dees-tuba-veneris#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carlo Ginzburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johannes Trithemius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owen Gingerich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warburg Institute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.180/voynichnews.com/?p=197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was the &#8220;Consecrated Little Book of Black Venus&#8221; really written by John Dee? I first saw this several years back, when I stumbled upon Joseph Peterson&#8217;s transcription of it on the Esoteric Archives website. The link with Dee seemed (and still seems) to me to be spurious: even though he is mentioned right at the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Was the &#8220;Consecrated Little Book of Black Venus&#8221; really written by John Dee? I first saw this several years back, when I stumbled upon Joseph Peterson&#8217;s transcription of it on the Esoteric Archives website.
The link with Dee seemed (and still seems) to me to be spurious: even though he is mentioned right at the start [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/08/04/john-dees-tuba-veneris/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warwick/Warburg course 2008, Day Three&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/06/08/warwickwarburg-course-2008-day-three</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/06/08/warwickwarburg-course-2008-day-three#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carlo Ginzburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Burnett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Hope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Kahn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warburg Institute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.180/voynichnews.com/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Day One of the Early Modern Research Techniques course was easy to write about, as was Day Two: but Day Three? Tricky&#8230; If I close my eyes, the single image from it burnt into my retinas is of Charles Hope sardonically half-warning participants about the historical Class A drug that is archival research. Yes, he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Day One of the Early Modern Research Techniques course was easy to write about, as was Day Two: but Day Three? Tricky&#8230;
If I close my eyes, the single image from it burnt into my retinas is of Charles Hope sardonically half-warning participants about the historical Class A drug that is archival research. Yes, he personally [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/06/08/warwickwarburg-course-2008-day-three/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

