<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cipher Mysteries &#187; Anthony Grafton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ciphermysteries.com/category/historians-of-note/anthony-grafton/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com</link>
	<description>The latest news, views, research and reviews on uncracked historical ciphers...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:09:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese Voynich theories&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2010/05/14/chinese-voynich-theories</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2010/05/14/chinese-voynich-theories#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 23:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anthony Grafton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacques Guy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosicrucianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=3013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following a trail of breadcrumbs from my recent post on Johann Adam Schall von Bell, I&#8217;m returning to the issue of whether the VMs could ever have had a Far Eastern origin. To recap, Jacques Guy originally proposed Chinese as a kind of linguistic fou-merde joke on the Voynich research community, only to be unhappily [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Following a trail of breadcrumbs from my recent post on Johann Adam Schall von Bell, I&#8217;m returning to the issue of whether the VMs could ever have had a Far Eastern origin. To recap, Jacques Guy originally proposed Chinese as a kind of linguistic fou-merde joke on the Voynich research community, only to be unhappily [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2010/05/14/chinese-voynich-theories/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy New Year, and some predictions for 2010&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/12/29/happy-new-year-and-some-predictions-for-2010</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/12/29/happy-new-year-and-some-predictions-for-2010#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anthony Grafton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beinecke Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Burnett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warburg Institute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=2554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once again, it&#8217;s time to roll out and dust off the Cipher Mysteries crystal skull crystal ball (no, I didn&#8217;t buy it on eBay, nor did I nick it from the British Museum) to peer dimly ahead to 2010. What will it bring us all? Of course, 2009&#8242;s big news was the radiocarbon dating of four slivers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Once again, it&#8217;s time to roll out and dust off the Cipher Mysteries crystal skull crystal ball (no, I didn&#8217;t buy it on eBay, nor did I nick it from the British Museum) to peer dimly ahead to 2010. What will it bring us all?
Of course, 2009&#8242;s big news was the radiocarbon dating of four slivers of [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/12/29/happy-new-year-and-some-predictions-for-2010/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More early modern correspondence sources&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/11/30/more-early-modern-correspondence-sources</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/11/30/more-early-modern-correspondence-sources#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anthony Grafton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prague]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=2386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Further to the recent (and much-commented-upon) post on Godefridus Aloysius Kinner&#8217;s correspondence, I had a snoop around to see what other early modern correspondence roadkill I could scrape off the infobahn&#8217;s oh-so-narrow historical lane. The most useful page I found was from the Warburg&#8217;s Scaliger Research Project (kindly established by Professor Anthony Grafton): this contained a long-ish list [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Further to the recent (and much-commented-upon) post on Godefridus Aloysius Kinner&#8217;s correspondence, I had a snoop around to see what other early modern correspondence roadkill I could scrape off the infobahn&#8217;s oh-so-narrow historical lane. The most useful page I found was from the Warburg&#8217;s Scaliger Research Project (kindly established by Professor Anthony Grafton): this contained a long-ish list [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/11/30/more-early-modern-correspondence-sources/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anthony Grafton article on the Republic of Letters&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/09/24/anthony-grafton-article-on-the-republic-of-letters</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/09/24/anthony-grafton-article-on-the-republic-of-letters#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anthony Grafton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=2122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just saw (via H-ITALY) an announcement for an online peer-reviewed journal from Stanford: We are delighted to announce the publication of a new digital journal, Republics of Letters. This peer-reviewed, open-access publication is dedicated to the study of knowledge, politics, and the arts, from Antiquity to the present, with an emphasis on the early-modern [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I just saw (via H-ITALY) an announcement for an online peer-reviewed journal from Stanford:

We are delighted to announce the publication of a new digital journal, Republics of Letters. This peer-reviewed, open-access publication is dedicated to the study of knowledge, politics, and the arts, from Antiquity to the present, with an emphasis on the early-modern period.

Its [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/09/24/anthony-grafton-article-on-the-republic-of-letters/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

