<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cipher Mysteries &#187; Richard SantaColoma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ciphermysteries.com/category/cipher-people/21st-century/richard-santacoloma/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com</link>
	<description>The latest news, views, research and reviews on uncracked historical ciphers...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:45:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A miscellany of nine-rosette links&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2010/05/29/a-miscellany-of-nine-rosette-links</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2010/05/29/a-miscellany-of-nine-rosette-links#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 09:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Milan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard SantaColoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Brumbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tycho Brahe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=3060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the most part, constructing plausible explanations for the drawings in the Voynich Manuscript is a fairly straightforward exercise. Even its apparently-weird botany could well be subtly rational (for example, if plants on opposite pages swapped their roots over in the original binding, in a kind of visual anagram), as could the astronomy, the astrology, and the water [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[For the most part, constructing plausible explanations for the drawings in the Voynich Manuscript is a fairly straightforward exercise. Even its apparently-weird botany could well be subtly rational (for example, if plants on opposite pages swapped their roots over in the original binding, in a kind of visual anagram), as could the astronomy, the astrology, and the water [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2010/05/29/a-miscellany-of-nine-rosette-links/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Das Voynich-Rätsel &#8211; now viewable online (but hurry!)</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/12/11/voynich-ratsel-now-viewable-online-but-hurry</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/12/11/voynich-ratsel-now-viewable-online-but-hurry#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gordon Rugg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rene Zandbergen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard SantaColoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andreas Sulzer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=2433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here it is, the Austrian Voynich documentary we&#8217;ve been waiting so eagerly for &#8211; and you don&#8217;t even need to have a satellite dish to watch it (as long as you hurry, it&#8217;ll probably only be online for a few days). (Hint and tip: if you click on the diagonal arrow button just above the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Here it is, the Austrian Voynich documentary we&#8217;ve been waiting so eagerly for &#8211; and you don&#8217;t even need to have a satellite dish to watch it (as long as you hurry, it&#8217;ll probably only be online for a few days).
(Hint and tip: if you click on the diagonal arrow button just above the video, [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/12/11/voynich-ratsel-now-viewable-online-but-hurry/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some new Voynich Manuscript blogs&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/05/27/some-new-voynich-manuscript-blogs</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/05/27/some-new-voynich-manuscript-blogs#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonardo da Vinci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary D'Imperio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard SantaColoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Curse of the Voynich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catoblepas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=1536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(1) A big hello to Rich SantaColoma as he emerges from the VMs &#8220;List Closet&#8221; into the bright(-ish) light of the blogosphere. His &#8220;New Atlantis Voynich Theory&#8221; blog sets out his basic stall &#8211; which is that, thanks to his &#8220;Nagging Sense of Newness&#8221; about the Voynich Manuscript, he harbours strong doubts that it is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[(1) A big hello to Rich SantaColoma as he emerges from the VMs &#8220;List Closet&#8221; into the bright(-ish) light of the blogosphere. His &#8220;New Atlantis Voynich Theory&#8221; blog sets out his basic stall &#8211; which is that, thanks to his &#8220;Nagging Sense of Newness&#8221; about the Voynich Manuscript, he harbours strong doubts that it is [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/05/27/some-new-voynich-manuscript-blogs/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;History Today&#8221; Spanish telescope article&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/09/15/history-today-spanish-telescope-article</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/09/15/history-today-spanish-telescope-article#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jose Maria Simon de Guilleuma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Pelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard SantaColoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telescope History]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the beginning of this year, I became interested in the mystery surrounding the invention of the telescope, spurred by Richard SantaColoma&#8217;s outrageous claims that the enciphered Voynich Manuscript contained images of telescopes disguised as strange tiered albarelli. But really, who did invent the telescope? Where did it come from? At first, I thought the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[At the beginning of this year, I became interested in the mystery surrounding the invention of the telescope, spurred by Richard SantaColoma&#8217;s outrageous claims that the enciphered Voynich Manuscript contained images of telescopes disguised as strange tiered albarelli. But really, who did invent the telescope? Where did it come from?
At first, I thought the answer [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/09/15/history-today-spanish-telescope-article/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voynich proto-optics&#8230;?</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/03/29/voynich-proto-optics</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/03/29/voynich-proto-optics#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Edward Kelley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Dee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard SantaColoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telescope History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cornelius Drebbel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f102r]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f102v]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f2v]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f67r1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f67r2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f67v1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f99v]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q17]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q19]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.180/voynichnews.com/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been reading up on the pre-history of the telescope recently (hence my reviews of Eileen Reeves&#8217; Galileo&#8217;s Glassworks and Albert van Helden&#8217;s The Invention of the Telescope), but have omitted to mention why I thought this might be of relevance to the Voynich Manuscript. The answer relates to Richard SantaColoma&#8217;s article in Renaissance Magazine [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been reading up on the pre-history of the telescope recently (hence my reviews of Eileen Reeves&#8217; Galileo&#8217;s Glassworks and Albert van Helden&#8217;s The Invention of the Telescope), but have omitted to mention why I thought this might be of relevance to the Voynich Manuscript.
The answer relates to Richard SantaColoma&#8217;s article in Renaissance Magazine #53 [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/03/29/voynich-proto-optics/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

