Cipher Mysteries

For the most part, constructing plausible explanations for the drawings in the Voynich Manuscript is a fairly straightforward exercise. Even its apparently-weird botany could well be subtly rational (for example, if plants on opposite pages swapped their roots over in the original binding, in a kind of visual anagram), as could the astronomy, the astrology, and the water / balneology quires (if all ...

Here it is, the Austrian Voynich documentary we've been waiting so eagerly for - and you don't even need to have a satellite dish to watch it (as long as you hurry, it'll probably only be online for a few days). (Hint and tip: if you click on the diagonal arrow button just above the video, you can watch ...

(1) A big hello to Rich SantaColoma as he emerges from the VMs "List Closet" into the bright(-ish) light of the blogosphere. His "New Atlantis Voynich Theory" blog sets out his basic stall - which is that, thanks to his "Nagging Sense of Newness" about the Voynich Manuscript, he harbours strong doubts that it is anywhere near as ...

At the beginning of this year, I became interested in the mystery surrounding the invention of the telescope, spurred by Richard SantaColoma's outrageous claims that the enciphered Voynich Manuscript contained images of telescopes disguised as strange tiered albarelli. But really, who did invent the telescope? Where did it come from? At first, I thought ...

I've been reading up on the pre-history of the telescope recently (hence my reviews of Eileen Reeves' Galileo's Glassworks and Albert van Helden's The Invention of the Telescope), but have omitted to mention why I thought this might be of relevance to the Voynich Manuscript. The answer relates to Richard SantaColoma's article in Renaissance Magazine #53 (March 2007) with ...