<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cipher Mysteries &#187; Dana Scott</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ciphermysteries.com/category/cipher-people/21st-century/dana-scott/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com</link>
	<description>The latest news, views, research and reviews on uncracked historical ciphers...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:45:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Voynich chicken scratches&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2010/07/20/voynich-chicken-scratches</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2010/07/20/voynich-chicken-scratches#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dana Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georg Baresch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glen Claston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marginalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Grove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Tattrie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=3240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Voynich Manuscript marginalia cognoscente, I&#8217;m always alert for new angles on the various incidental marks apparently added by its later owners. So, when Tim Tattrie left a comment about the &#8220;chicken scratch&#8221; marginalia on my recent Voynich-frontiers-circa-2010 post, I thought it was probably time to revisit them here. Tim&#8217;s query was whether anyone had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[As a Voynich Manuscript marginalia cognoscente, I&#8217;m always alert for new angles on the various incidental marks apparently added by its later owners. So, when Tim Tattrie left a comment about the &#8220;chicken scratch&#8221; marginalia on my recent Voynich-frontiers-circa-2010 post, I thought it was probably time to revisit them here.
Tim&#8217;s query was whether anyone had pursued [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2010/07/20/voynich-chicken-scratches/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spanish Voynich theory&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/07/17/spanish-voynich-theory</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/07/17/spanish-voynich-theory#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dana Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enrique Joven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rolando Hernandez Rivero]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.180/voynichnews.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another day, another Voynich theory to add to the list of theories. Today&#8217;s one (courtesy of Rolando Hernandez Rivero) proposes that the VMs is written in old Spanish, though with some Latin and English words thrown into the mix. Rolando also asserts that [what he calls] Hand 1 is &#8220;scatterbrained&#8221; and has many errors, while [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Another day, another Voynich theory to add to the list of theories. Today&#8217;s one (courtesy of Rolando Hernandez Rivero) proposes that the VMs is written in old Spanish, though with some Latin and English words thrown into the mix. Rolando also asserts that [what he calls] Hand 1 is &#8220;scatterbrained&#8221; and has many errors, while [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/07/17/spanish-voynich-theory/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

