<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cipher Mysteries &#187; Robert Brumbaugh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ciphermysteries.com/category/cipher-people/1900-1979/robert-brumbaugh/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com</link>
	<description>The latest news, views, research and reviews on uncracked historical ciphers...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:45:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>First Voynich theory of 2012&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2012/01/28/first-voynich-theory-of-2012</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2012/01/28/first-voynich-theory-of-2012#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Robert Brumbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Romaine Newbold]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=4324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To get 2012 rolling, I thought you might like to know that Walter Grosse has just started an English-language blog about his Voynich Manuscript theory. Briefly, he proposes that each Voynichese &#8216;word&#8217; super-verbosely enciphers a digit, based purely on the number of letters it contains. So, the first six words of page f1r (in EVA: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[To get 2012 rolling, I thought you might like to know that Walter Grosse has just started an English-language blog about his Voynich Manuscript theory.
Briefly, he proposes that each Voynichese &#8216;word&#8217; super-verbosely enciphers a digit, based purely on the number of letters it contains. So, the first six words of page f1r (in EVA: &#8220;fachys [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2012/01/28/first-voynich-theory-of-2012/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A miscellany of nine-rosette links&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2010/05/29/a-miscellany-of-nine-rosette-links</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2010/05/29/a-miscellany-of-nine-rosette-links#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 09:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Milan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard SantaColoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Brumbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tycho Brahe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=3060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the most part, constructing plausible explanations for the drawings in the Voynich Manuscript is a fairly straightforward exercise. Even its apparently-weird botany could well be subtly rational (for example, if plants on opposite pages swapped their roots over in the original binding, in a kind of visual anagram), as could the astronomy, the astrology, and the water [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[For the most part, constructing plausible explanations for the drawings in the Voynich Manuscript is a fairly straightforward exercise. Even its apparently-weird botany could well be subtly rational (for example, if plants on opposite pages swapped their roots over in the original binding, in a kind of visual anagram), as could the astronomy, the astrology, and the water [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2010/05/29/a-miscellany-of-nine-rosette-links/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Voynichese stateless or stateful?</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2010/03/21/is-voynichese-stateless-or-stateful</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2010/03/21/is-voynichese-stateless-or-stateful#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leon Battista Alberti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Brumbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Ekwall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=2899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you combine the thoughts I posted yesterday (suggesting that the &#8220;o[r]aiiv&#8221; word in the top line of f67r1 might encipher &#8220;luna&#8221;) with the &#8220;or oro ror&#8221; sequence on line #2 of f15v (which would appear to be a verbosely enciphered Roman numeral, probably &#8220;CCCC&#8221;), the two would superficially seem to be incompatible. How can the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you combine the thoughts I posted yesterday (suggesting that the &#8220;o[r]aiiv&#8221; word in the top line of f67r1 might encipher &#8220;luna&#8221;) with the &#8220;or oro ror&#8221; sequence on line #2 of f15v (which would appear to be a verbosely enciphered Roman numeral, probably &#8220;CCCC&#8221;), the two would superficially seem to be incompatible. How can the [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2010/03/21/is-voynichese-stateless-or-stateful/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jody Maat&#8217;s &#8220;Old Dutch&#8221; Voynich theory&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/06/03/jody-maats-old-dutch-voynich-theory</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/06/03/jody-maats-old-dutch-voynich-theory#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 12:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glen Claston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leo Levitov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Brumbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Theories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=1613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would we recognize the solution to the Voynich Manuscript even if it was right in front of us? Some people believe that it continues to evade us because our expectations of where we should be looking are wrong: in other words, that, pace Henri Atlan (as quoted by Cornelius Castoriadis), we have got into the habit of looking beneath [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Would we recognize the solution to the Voynich Manuscript even if it was right in front of us?
Some people believe that it continues to evade us because our expectations of where we should be looking are wrong: in other words, that, pace Henri Atlan (as quoted by Cornelius Castoriadis), we have got into the habit of looking beneath lampposts [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/06/03/jody-maats-old-dutch-voynich-theory/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Florentine astrology shorthand&#8230;?</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/05/04/florentine-astrology-shorthand</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/05/04/florentine-astrology-shorthand#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 11:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Robert Brumbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=1391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a nice palaeographic puzzle for you! While looking at some images from a linked pair of Florentine astronomical / astrological manuscripts written circa 1400 (as Voynich researchers inevitably do), I noticed that one had an unknown shorthand (?). So far I&#8217;ve only had access to a handful of the pages, so the full document would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a nice palaeographic puzzle for you! While looking at some images from a linked pair of Florentine astronomical / astrological manuscripts written circa 1400 (as Voynich researchers inevitably do), I noticed that one had an unknown shorthand (?). So far I&#8217;ve only had access to a handful of the pages, so the full document would [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/05/04/florentine-astrology-shorthand/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robert Teague&#8217;s Voynich claim&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/03/13/robert-teagues-voynich-claim</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/03/13/robert-teagues-voynich-claim#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marginalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Brumbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Romaine Newbold]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has Robert Teague found a sensational astronomical &#8216;crib&#8217; into the Voynich Manuscript&#8217;s ciphertext? Several Voynicheros have asked me to have a look at his claim: normally, this is researcher code for &#8220;I think it&#8217;s nonsense but I&#8217;d like someone else to say it rather than me, because I quite like the guy&#8220;, but let&#8217;s see what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Has Robert Teague found a sensational astronomical &#8216;crib&#8217; into the Voynich Manuscript&#8217;s ciphertext? Several Voynicheros have asked me to have a look at his claim: normally, this is researcher code for &#8220;I think it&#8217;s nonsense but I&#8217;d like someone else to say it rather than me, because I quite like the guy&#8220;, but let&#8217;s see what [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/03/13/robert-teagues-voynich-claim/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Edith Sherwood&#8217;s anagram cipher&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/02/17/edith-sherwoods-anagram-cipher</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/02/17/edith-sherwoods-anagram-cipher#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antonio Averlino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edith Sherwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonardo da Vinci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Brumbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Bacon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Romaine Newbold]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new day brings a new Google Adwords campaign from Edith Sherwood (Edith, please just email me instead, it&#8217;ll get the word out far quicker), though this time not promoting another angle on her Leonardo-made-the-Voynich-Manuscript hypothesis&#8230; but rather a transposition cipher Voynichese hypothesis. Specifically, she proposes that the Voynich Manuscript may well be Italian written in a simple [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A new day brings a new Google Adwords campaign from Edith Sherwood (Edith, please just email me instead, it&#8217;ll get the word out far quicker), though this time not promoting another angle on her Leonardo-made-the-Voynich-Manuscript hypothesis&#8230; but rather a transposition cipher Voynichese hypothesis. Specifically, she proposes that the Voynich Manuscript may well be Italian written in a simple [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/02/17/edith-sherwoods-anagram-cipher/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>German zodiac woodcuts&#8230;?</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/01/17/german-zodiac-woodcuts</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/01/17/german-zodiac-woodcuts#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jorge Stolfi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rafal Prinke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rene Zandbergen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Brumbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erwin Panofsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ewa Sniezynska-Stolot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sagittarius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My last post on Elmar Vogt&#8217;s new blog received a comment from infinitii, asking me for the source for the suggestion that the zodiac motifs may have been copied from a (possibly 14th century) German woodcut calendar. I had long forgotten the story&#8217;s origin, but a quick grep through the VMs mailing list archives (the ones [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[My last post on Elmar Vogt&#8217;s new blog received a comment from infinitii, asking me for the source for the suggestion that the zodiac motifs may have been copied from a (possibly 14th century) German woodcut calendar. I had long forgotten the story&#8217;s origin, but a quick grep through the VMs mailing list archives (the ones [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/01/17/german-zodiac-woodcuts/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pietro Andrea Mattioli&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/07/26/pietro-andrea-mattioli</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/07/26/pietro-andrea-mattioli#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beinecke Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobus de Tepenecz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcelo Dos Santos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pietro Andrea Mattioli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rene Zandbergen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Brumbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudolf II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tadeas Hajek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f17r]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.180/voynichnews.com/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google only finds about ten pages where Pietro Andrea Mattioli (1501-1577) is linked with the Voynich Manuscript. Here&#8217;s a short research note to fill that gap&#8230; If you look at Mattioli&#8217;s CV, you&#8217;ll see plenty of echoes with other people linked to the VMs. Though a renowned herbal compiler &#38; writer in his spare time, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Google only finds about ten pages where Pietro Andrea Mattioli (1501-1577) is linked with the Voynich Manuscript. Here&#8217;s a short research note to fill that gap&#8230;
If you look at Mattioli&#8217;s CV, you&#8217;ll see plenty of echoes with other people linked to the VMs. Though a renowned herbal compiler &amp; writer in his spare time, he [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/07/26/pietro-andrea-mattioli/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Become A Voynich Manuscript Expert In Just 5 Minutes&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/07/20/become-a-voynich-manuscript-expert-in-just-5-minutes</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/07/20/become-a-voynich-manuscript-expert-in-just-5-minutes#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beinecke Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobus de Tepenecz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonardo da Vinci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Brumbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudolf II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilfrid Voynich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Romaine Newbold]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.180/voynichnews.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would having &#8220;Expert on the Voynich Manuscript&#8221; on your CV significantly raise your perceived intellectuality (i.e. an extra ten grand per year on your salary)? It would? Then read on, and I&#8217;ll reveal the secret two-stage process that They don&#8217;t want you to find out&#8230; Stage One. You start out by pretending to be a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Would having &#8220;Expert on the Voynich Manuscript&#8221; on your CV significantly raise your perceived intellectuality (i.e. an extra ten grand per year on your salary)? It would? Then read on, and I&#8217;ll reveal the secret two-stage process that They don&#8217;t want you to find out&#8230;
Stage One. You start out by pretending to be a Voynich [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/07/20/become-a-voynich-manuscript-expert-in-just-5-minutes/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

