<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cipher Mysteries &#187; Johannes Marcus Marci</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ciphermysteries.com/category/cipher-people/17th-century/johannes-marcus-marci/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com</link>
	<description>The latest news, views, research and reviews on uncracked historical ciphers...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:45:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Bacon &amp; the Voynich Manuscript, revisited&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/12/28/roger-bacon-the-voynich-manuscript-revisited</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/12/28/roger-bacon-the-voynich-manuscript-revisited#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 12:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Athanasius Kircher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georg Baresch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobus de Tepenecz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johannes Marcus Marci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Bacon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudolf II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilfrid Voynich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=2537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Wilfrid Voynich bought his (now eponymous) manuscript in 1912, it was accompanied by a 1665 letter from Johannes Marcus Marci to Athanasius Kircher. In that, Marci noted three things that Raphael Mnishovsky (King Ferdinand III&#8217;s Czech language tutor) had told him about the strange artefact:- &#8220;that the said book belonged to Emperor Rudolf&#8220; &#8220;that [Rudolf II] presented 600 ducats [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[When Wilfrid Voynich bought his (now eponymous) manuscript in 1912, it was accompanied by a 1665 letter from Johannes Marcus Marci to Athanasius Kircher. In that, Marci noted three things that Raphael Mnishovsky (King Ferdinand III&#8217;s Czech language tutor) had told him about the strange artefact:-

&#8220;that the said book belonged to Emperor Rudolf&#8220;
&#8220;that [Rudolf II] presented 600 ducats to the [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/12/28/roger-bacon-the-voynich-manuscript-revisited/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Other Kinner letters&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/11/26/other-kinner-letters</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/11/26/other-kinner-letters#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Athanasius Kircher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johannes Marcus Marci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prague]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=2380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though the Dean at All Saints in the Citadel of Prague was one of the earliest people to mention the Voynich Manuscript (in two letters to his old friend Athanasius Kircher), poor old Godefridus (Gottfried) Aloysius Kinner of Löwenthurn hasn&#8217;t really featured much in the discussion so far. In Kinner&#8217;s letter dated 4th January 1666, he mentions to Kircher that their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Though the Dean at All Saints in the Citadel of Prague was one of the earliest people to mention the Voynich Manuscript (in two letters to his old friend Athanasius Kircher), poor old Godefridus (Gottfried) Aloysius Kinner of Löwenthurn hasn&#8217;t really featured much in the discussion so far.
In Kinner&#8217;s letter dated 4th January 1666, he mentions to Kircher that their mutual [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/11/26/other-kinner-letters/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Micky Bet Voynich piece, now in English (sort of)&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/11/20/micky-bet-voynich-piece-now-in-english-sort-of</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/11/20/micky-bet-voynich-piece-now-in-english-sort-of#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astrology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Athanasius Kircher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beinecke Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hans Kraus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johannes Marcus Marci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Dee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prague]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilfrid Voynich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Romaine Newbold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Micky Bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occulto TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=2363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much as I enjoyed watching Micky Bet covering the Voynich Manuscript, I couldn&#8217;t help but wonder how much better it would be had it had a slightly funkier script. So (courtesy of the kind people at Overstream) I added my own captions. Enjoy! (If you can&#8217;t see this in your browser or email client, here&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Much as I enjoyed watching Micky Bet covering the Voynich Manuscript, I couldn&#8217;t help but wonder how much better it would be had it had a slightly funkier script. So (courtesy of the kind people at Overstream) I added my own captions. Enjoy!  
(If you can&#8217;t see this in your browser or email client, here&#8217;s [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/11/20/micky-bet-voynich-piece-now-in-english-sort-of/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Earliest archival reference to the Voynich Manuscript&#8230;???</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/08/29/earliest-archival-reference-to-the-voynich-manuscript</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/08/29/earliest-archival-reference-to-the-voynich-manuscript#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alchemy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonio Averlino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holy Roman Empire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobus de Tepenecz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johannes Marcus Marci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Dee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prague]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rafal Prinke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudolf II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Carrington Bolton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=1971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A vast constellation of curious books revolves around the hazily uncertain core of the Voynich Manuscript: as with most things, some are outright good, some are just plain bad, while most live in a mixed-up zone in the middle. Henry Carrington Bolton&#8217;s (1904) &#8221; The Follies of Science at the Court of Rudolph II&#8221; is a poster-child for that mixed-up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vast constellation of curious books revolves around the hazily uncertain core of the Voynich Manuscript: as with most things, some are outright good, some are just plain bad, while most live in a mixed-up zone in the middle.
Henry Carrington Bolton&#8217;s (1904) &#8221; The Follies of Science at the Court of Rudolph II&#8221; is a poster-child for that mixed-up zone [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/08/29/earliest-archival-reference-to-the-voynich-manuscript/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New translations&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/10/17/new-translations</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/10/17/new-translations#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Athanasius Kircher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georg Baresch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobus de Tepenecz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Hurych]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johannes Marcus Marci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jorge Stolfi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rene Zandbergen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tycho Brahe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heliotropic plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paula Findlen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Neal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in May this year, I suggested to my friend Philip Neal that a really useful Voynich research thing he could do would be to translate the passages relating to Jacobus Tepenecz (Sinapius) that Jorge Stolfi once copied from Schmidl&#8217;s (1754) Historiæ Societatis Jesu Provinciæ Bohemiæ (though Stolfi omitted to the section III 75 concerning Melnik) from Latin. The documentation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Back in May this year, I suggested to my friend Philip Neal that a really useful Voynich research thing he could do would be to translate the passages relating to Jacobus Tepenecz (Sinapius) that Jorge Stolfi once copied from Schmidl&#8217;s (1754) Historiæ Societatis Jesu Provinciæ Bohemiæ (though Stolfi omitted to the section III 75 concerning Melnik) from Latin. The documentation [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/10/17/new-translations/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Voynich Manuscript&quot;: two words, two lies?</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/07/24/voynich-manuscript-two-words-two-lies</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/07/24/voynich-manuscript-two-words-two-lies#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Georg Baresch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holy Roman Empire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobus de Tepenecz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johannes Marcus Marci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Pelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Bacon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudolf II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Villa Mondragone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilfrid Voynich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cornelius Castoriadis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justified true belief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voltaire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.180/voynichnews.com/?p=186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While writing my MBA dissertation a few years ago, I spun off a short paper called &#8220;Justified True Belief: Three Words, Three Lies?&#8220;, where the abstract explained its title:- Cornelius Castoriadis once famously described the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics as “four words, four lies”: here, I examine each of the three words of “justified [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[While writing my MBA dissertation a few years ago, I spun off a short paper called &#8220;Justified True Belief: Three Words, Three Lies?&#8220;, where the abstract explained its title:-
Cornelius Castoriadis once famously described the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics as “four words, four lies”: here, I examine each of the three words of “justified true [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/07/24/voynich-manuscript-two-words-two-lies/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Czech Voynich theory&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/07/19/czech-voynich-theory</link>
		<comments>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/07/19/czech-voynich-theory#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Edward Kelley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georg Baresch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobus de Tepenecz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Hurych]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johannes Marcus Marci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Dee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonardo da Vinci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pietro Andrea Mattioli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prague]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudolf II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tadeas Hajek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voynich Theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orinoco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://79.170.40.180/voynichnews.com/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My fellow Voynich old-timer Jan Hurych has long been interested in various Prague-linked research strands: after all, Prague was home to the first three properly-documented owners of the Voynich Manuscript (Jacobus de Tepenecz, Georg Baresch, and Johannes Marcus Marci), as well as its most illustrious claimed owner (Holy Roman Emperor Rudolf II). It is certainly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[My fellow Voynich old-timer Jan Hurych has long been interested in various Prague-linked research strands: after all, Prague was home to the first three properly-documented owners of the Voynich Manuscript (Jacobus de Tepenecz, Georg Baresch, and Johannes Marcus Marci), as well as its most illustrious claimed owner (Holy Roman Emperor Rudolf II).
It is certainly true [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2008/07/19/czech-voynich-theory/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

