Comments on: Review: Erich von Däniken’s “History Is Wrong”… http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2010/01/23/review-erich-von-danikens-history-is-wrong The latest news, views, research and reviews on uncracked historical ciphers... Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:44:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Petros Petrosyan http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2010/01/23/review-erich-von-danikens-history-is-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-41792 Petros Petrosyan Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:00:02 +0000 http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=2670#comment-41792 Unsolved Ciphers ... Hi , I'm Petros Petrosyan. I now live in Chicago. Attention Please! Very Important... Please Go to: http://www.world-mysteries.com/pex_PPetrosyan1.htm 1. The pyramid is not a sepulcher of Pharaoh and the purpose of its construction was not on this plane. 2. The basic model of the Pyramid cipher was established. The basic model of the code of a pyramid is formed of 365 small pyramids which consist at 14 steps of model of the code. Thanks, Petros M.Petrosyan Unsolved Ciphers …

Hi ,
I’m Petros Petrosyan.
I now live in Chicago.

Attention Please!
Very Important…

Please Go to: http://www.world-mysteries.com/pex_PPetrosyan1.htm

1. The pyramid is not a sepulcher of Pharaoh and the purpose of
its construction was not on this plane.
2. The basic model of the Pyramid cipher was established.
The basic model of the code of a pyramid is formed of 365 small pyramids
which consist at 14 steps of model of the code.

Thanks,
Petros M.Petrosyan

]]> By: wt http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2010/01/23/review-erich-von-danikens-history-is-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-36908 wt Mon, 14 Feb 2011 06:39:19 +0000 http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=2670#comment-36908 Nickpelling, you are truly an idiot and you're one of those types that refuse to believe in new research or ideas. Go back to your cave and bury your head in the sand moron. Nickpelling, you are truly an idiot and you’re one of those types that refuse to believe in new research or ideas. Go back to your cave and bury your head in the sand moron.

]]> By: nickpelling http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2010/01/23/review-erich-von-danikens-history-is-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-15187 nickpelling Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:41:02 +0000 http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=2670#comment-15187 EvD peaked too early for the whole Internet conspiracy thing - if the three points of reference for 20th century conspiracy theorists are (1) money/power, (2) religion, and (3) aliens, he seems to have settled on the unfashionable side of that triangle. (Though it's also true that [Egypt + aliens] has had a fair number of Giza geezers post-EvD). As such, he's in the odd position of being a religio-alien conspiracy theorist who's even outside the religio-alien conspiracy "mainstream", and so has struggled even to garner praise from there. Poor (rich) old Erich - when even conspiracy theorists don't like his stuff, no wonder he feels misunderstood! EvD peaked too early for the whole Internet conspiracy thing – if the three points of reference for 20th century conspiracy theorists are (1) money/power, (2) religion, and (3) aliens, he seems to have settled on the unfashionable side of that triangle. (Though it’s also true that [Egypt + aliens] has had a fair number of Giza geezers post-EvD). As such, he’s in the odd position of being a religio-alien conspiracy theorist who’s even outside the religio-alien conspiracy “mainstream”, and so has struggled even to garner praise from there. Poor (rich) old Erich – when even conspiracy theorists don’t like his stuff, no wonder he feels misunderstood!

]]> By: PJ http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2010/01/23/review-erich-von-danikens-history-is-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-15183 PJ Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:31:15 +0000 http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=2670#comment-15183 Mmmh ... This book came out in German sometime ago with the title, if I remember correctly "Falsch informiert!" (lit. "Wrongly informed") and I think I just read the section referring to the Voynich Manuscript. Ever the optimist, I was hoping that von Däniken might provide a new, insightful slant on the matter ... but, no, nothing of the sort. Why am I so naive? Did I really expect that someone who claims God astronauts may have visited the earth (or some such nonsense) could write intelligently about the Vms? Charming he may be, however his anti-establishment historical views (here I mean what the majority of historians and archaeologists believe to be true about the past) will always endear him to those who "believe" completely in conspiracy theories of history etc. EvD will always garner praise from that corner, just as much as he is scorned by serious researchers. Mmmh … This book came out in German sometime ago with the title, if I remember correctly “Falsch informiert!” (lit. “Wrongly informed”) and I think I just read the section referring to the Voynich Manuscript. Ever the optimist, I was hoping that von Däniken might provide a new, insightful slant on the matter … but, no, nothing of the sort. Why am I so naive? Did I really expect that someone who claims God astronauts may have visited the earth (or some such nonsense) could write intelligently about the Vms? Charming he may be, however his anti-establishment historical views (here I mean what the majority of historians and archaeologists believe to be true about the past) will always endear him to those who “believe” completely in conspiracy theories of history etc. EvD will always garner praise from that corner, just as much as he is scorned by serious researchers.

]]>