<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q13 and Voynich balneology sources&#8230;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/06/18/q13-and-voynich-balneology-sources/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/06/18/q13-and-voynich-balneology-sources</link>
	<description>The latest news, views, research and reviews on uncracked historical ciphers...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:57:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: nickpelling</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/06/18/q13-and-voynich-balneology-sources/comment-page-1#comment-6791</link>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=1706#comment-6791</guid>
		<description>Hi Rene,

I really wouldn&#039;t advise relying on the scans for alignment between paint transfers, because the pages were photographed bound and hand-trimmed in a graphics editor (both of which introduce secondary offset errors). It&#039;s one of those things you have to actually go to the Beinecke to check properly (&lt;em&gt;will you be going back soon?&lt;/em&gt;)

Oh, and the mini-text column on the top right of f75v is a new one to me, nice find! :-) 

Cheers, ....Nick Pelling....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rene,</p>
<p>I really wouldn&#8217;t advise relying on the scans for alignment between paint transfers, because the pages were photographed bound and hand-trimmed in a graphics editor (both of which introduce secondary offset errors). It&#8217;s one of those things you have to actually go to the Beinecke to check properly (<em>will you be going back soon?</em>)</p>
<p>Oh, and the mini-text column on the top right of f75v is a new one to me, nice find! <img src='http://www.ciphermysteries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Cheers, &#8230;.Nick Pelling&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene Zandbergen</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/06/18/q13-and-voynich-balneology-sources/comment-page-1#comment-6790</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene Zandbergen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=1706#comment-6790</guid>
		<description>Having looked at the paint transfer between 78v and 81r, shown above, I am not fully
convinced that 81r is really the source of the small spot on 78v.
I think that there could be three spots in this area. I&#039;ll have another look in the coming days...

More interestingly, I saw again something I had completely forgotten about, namely
the six individual characters in the upper right corner of f75v. They don&#039;t fully align with the text.
They have also not been discussed as much as their counterpart on the facing page f76r
(if at all)...

Cheers, Rene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having looked at the paint transfer between 78v and 81r, shown above, I am not fully<br />
convinced that 81r is really the source of the small spot on 78v.<br />
I think that there could be three spots in this area. I&#8217;ll have another look in the coming days&#8230;</p>
<p>More interestingly, I saw again something I had completely forgotten about, namely<br />
the six individual characters in the upper right corner of f75v. They don&#8217;t fully align with the text.<br />
They have also not been discussed as much as their counterpart on the facing page f76r<br />
(if at all)&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers, Rene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickpelling</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/06/18/q13-and-voynich-balneology-sources/comment-page-1#comment-6149</link>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=1706#comment-6149</guid>
		<description>Hi Rene,

I somehow doubt there remain any sides of the VMs you haven&#039;t thought of over the years. :-)  

The point of the post was to draw attention not only to this Q13a/Q13b split, but also to the (far from obvious, I think) parallels between Herbal-A-vs-Herbal-B drawings and Q13b-vs-Q13a drawings, and to try to tease out what that might mean for the overall timeline of the VMs&#039; construction.

Of course, I&#039;m probably guilty here of not separating out my hypotheses and observations quite as clearly as you would like: but it should be pretty obvious what I&#039;m thinking of. :-)  

Cheers, ....Nick Pelling....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rene,</p>
<p>I somehow doubt there remain any sides of the VMs you haven&#8217;t thought of over the years. <img src='http://www.ciphermysteries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>The point of the post was to draw attention not only to this Q13a/Q13b split, but also to the (far from obvious, I think) parallels between Herbal-A-vs-Herbal-B drawings and Q13b-vs-Q13a drawings, and to try to tease out what that might mean for the overall timeline of the VMs&#8217; construction.</p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;m probably guilty here of not separating out my hypotheses and observations quite as clearly as you would like: but it should be pretty obvious what I&#8217;m thinking of. <img src='http://www.ciphermysteries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>Cheers, &#8230;.Nick Pelling&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rene zandbergen</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/06/18/q13-and-voynich-balneology-sources/comment-page-1#comment-6112</link>
		<dc:creator>rene zandbergen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=1706#comment-6112</guid>
		<description>This is both interesting and odd, since some years ago I had wondered about this very same
possiblilty, namely that this quire could consist of two separate parts: bio- versus balneo-
and I came to the conclusion that it wasn&#039;t the case.
I will have to take another look now...
(And no, I am not claiming priority :-) ).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is both interesting and odd, since some years ago I had wondered about this very same<br />
possiblilty, namely that this quire could consist of two separate parts: bio- versus balneo-<br />
and I came to the conclusion that it wasn&#8217;t the case.<br />
I will have to take another look now&#8230;<br />
(And no, I am not claiming priority <img src='http://www.ciphermysteries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

