<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A guide to Leonardo da Vinci&#8217;s handwriting&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/04/11/a-guide-to-leonardo-da-vincis-handwriting/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/04/11/a-guide-to-leonardo-da-vincis-handwriting</link>
	<description>The latest news, views, research and reviews on uncracked historical ciphers...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:13:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene Zandbergen</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/04/11/a-guide-to-leonardo-da-vincis-handwriting/comment-page-1#comment-3075</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene Zandbergen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=1185#comment-3075</guid>
		<description>&quot;not unsurprisingly&quot;....

these double negatives :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;not unsurprisingly&#8221;&#8230;.</p>
<p>these double negatives <img src='http://www.ciphermysteries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene Zandbergen</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/04/11/a-guide-to-leonardo-da-vincis-handwriting/comment-page-1#comment-3010</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene Zandbergen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=1185#comment-3010</guid>
		<description>Hi Nick,

not unsurprisingly, probably, I beg to differ about the interest
of the post-1600 history :) It is indeed unlikely (yet not
impossible) to bring new information about the origin of the
Voynich MS, but it is at least fulfilling in the sense that it is 
something we know exists (as opposed to the &#039;meaning&#039; of 
the MS), and which also brings some new insights in other 
areas.

On topic: I am not at all convinced about the Leonardo connection.
In fact, I am convinced that it isn&#039;t there and agree with your
analysis of the f116v &#039;x&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick,</p>
<p>not unsurprisingly, probably, I beg to differ about the interest<br />
of the post-1600 history <img src='http://www.ciphermysteries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  It is indeed unlikely (yet not<br />
impossible) to bring new information about the origin of the<br />
Voynich MS, but it is at least fulfilling in the sense that it is<br />
something we know exists (as opposed to the &#8216;meaning&#8217; of<br />
the MS), and which also brings some new insights in other<br />
areas.</p>
<p>On topic: I am not at all convinced about the Leonardo connection.<br />
In fact, I am convinced that it isn&#8217;t there and agree with your<br />
analysis of the f116v &#8216;x&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No such thing as a free lunch &#171; Thoughts about the Voynich Manuscript</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/04/11/a-guide-to-leonardo-da-vincis-handwriting/comment-page-1#comment-2936</link>
		<dc:creator>No such thing as a free lunch &#171; Thoughts about the Voynich Manuscript</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=1185#comment-2936</guid>
		<description>[...] Thoughts about the Voynich Manuscript Qocheedy daiin daiiin!    &#171; Final Words on the Voynich&#160;Manuscript    No such thing as a free&#160;lunch April 14, 2009   Lately, I checked out f66r in a different context, and these days the page also showed up on Nick Pelling&#8217;s blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thoughts about the Voynich Manuscript Qocheedy daiin daiiin!    &laquo; Final Words on the Voynich&nbsp;Manuscript    No such thing as a free&nbsp;lunch April 14, 2009   Lately, I checked out f66r in a different context, and these days the page also showed up on Nick Pelling&#8217;s blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickpelling</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/04/11/a-guide-to-leonardo-da-vincis-handwriting/comment-page-1#comment-2889</link>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=1185#comment-2889</guid>
		<description>Sometimes I think much the same about the VMs&#039; history post-1600 - have all the man-years spent trawling those archives really advanced our understanding of the VMs&#039; early life in any way?

The Occitan-like marginalia (f17r, f66r, f116v) do have the particular benefit of being roughly a century earlier: so untangling their codicological knot may yet yield an enormous historical benefit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes I think much the same about the VMs&#8217; history post-1600 &#8211; have all the man-years spent trawling those archives really advanced our understanding of the VMs&#8217; early life in any way?</p>
<p>The Occitan-like marginalia (f17r, f66r, f116v) do have the particular benefit of being roughly a century earlier: so untangling their codicological knot may yet yield an enormous historical benefit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/04/11/a-guide-to-leonardo-da-vincis-handwriting/comment-page-1#comment-2875</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 01:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=1185#comment-2875</guid>
		<description>o pox on all f116v nonsense!  Far too much ink has been wasted on it, for all too little return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>o pox on all f116v nonsense!  Far too much ink has been wasted on it, for all too little return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/04/11/a-guide-to-leonardo-da-vincis-handwriting/comment-page-1#comment-2852</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 11:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=1185#comment-2852</guid>
		<description>Leonardo or no Leonardo, the text on the last page is written most likely by some other hand than the   VM itself. It seems improbable that Leo would be writing comments in the VM and by right hand at that. It is just another part of Sherwood forest :-).

Jan

P.S. I would not be surprised if we next time hear it was written by Robbin&#039; Hood himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leonardo or no Leonardo, the text on the last page is written most likely by some other hand than the   VM itself. It seems improbable that Leo would be writing comments in the VM and by right hand at that. It is just another part of Sherwood forest <img src='http://www.ciphermysteries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>Jan</p>
<p>P.S. I would not be surprised if we next time hear it was written by Robbin&#8217; Hood himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
