<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Elmar Vogt&#8217;s new Voynich blog&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/01/15/elmar-vogts-new-voynich-blog/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/01/15/elmar-vogts-new-voynich-blog</link>
	<description>The latest news, views, research and reviews on uncracked historical ciphers...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:49:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: jonah fowl</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/01/15/elmar-vogts-new-voynich-blog/comment-page-1#comment-12406</link>
		<dc:creator>jonah fowl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=634#comment-12406</guid>
		<description>the sample I added is very simple, with replacement by symbols would be really hard to figure out.
Hint: set words in order by their length....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the sample I added is very simple, with replacement by symbols would be really hard to figure out.<br />
Hint: set words in order by their length&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickpelling</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/01/15/elmar-vogts-new-voynich-blog/comment-page-1#comment-12404</link>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=634#comment-12404</guid>
		<description>:-)

Did you manage to decipher the similar-ish one from 1641 I posted up (slightly modified) at the bottom of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/11/11/voynichese-biliteral-cipher&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt;?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Fildy, fagodur wyndeldra rogered ifsec ogure rantebrad&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Enjoy! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://www.ciphermysteries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Did you manage to decipher the similar-ish one from 1641 I posted up (slightly modified) at the bottom of <a href="http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/11/11/voynichese-biliteral-cipher" rel="nofollow">this page</a>?</p>
<blockquote><p>Fildy, fagodur wyndeldra rogered ifsec ogure rantebrad</p></blockquote>
<p>Enjoy! <img src='http://www.ciphermysteries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonah fowl</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/01/15/elmar-vogts-new-voynich-blog/comment-page-1#comment-12403</link>
		<dc:creator>jonah fowl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=634#comment-12403</guid>
		<description>Manual cipher are fun. Here one sample:

ryp i togr acodeb nc c eac ookisad ocumentu od sedforimp odep aphy, ntains tablefor lementinga ookco alookup codingand</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manual cipher are fun. Here one sample:</p>
<p>ryp i togr acodeb nc c eac ookisad ocumentu od sedforimp odep aphy, ntains tablefor lementinga ookco alookup codingand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickpelling</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/01/15/elmar-vogts-new-voynich-blog/comment-page-1#comment-12398</link>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=634#comment-12398</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t be disheartened - hunting for doubled letters is one of the oldest cryptological tricks in the book. Cicco Simonetta even noted (in 1474) that the only word with a tripled letter was &quot;uvula&quot; (because u and v were written the same in Latin), though that may not be particularly useful. :-)

Voynich researcher Marke Fincher recently posted to the VMs list about the mysterious behaviour of double &quot;d&quot; (basically, it normally appears towards the end of a line), and it is curious observations like this that may well help to find some corner of the Voynich cipher we can prise up.

But the suggestion that Voynichese is a simple monoalphabetic substitution cipher was pretty much known to be false as early as 1930 (and the 16th century person who tried to fill out a deciphering column on page f1r didn&#039;t seem to do much better).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t be disheartened &#8211; hunting for doubled letters is one of the oldest cryptological tricks in the book. Cicco Simonetta even noted (in 1474) that the only word with a tripled letter was &#8220;uvula&#8221; (because u and v were written the same in Latin), though that may not be particularly useful. <img src='http://www.ciphermysteries.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Voynich researcher Marke Fincher recently posted to the VMs list about the mysterious behaviour of double &#8220;d&#8221; (basically, it normally appears towards the end of a line), and it is curious observations like this that may well help to find some corner of the Voynich cipher we can prise up.</p>
<p>But the suggestion that Voynichese is a simple monoalphabetic substitution cipher was pretty much known to be false as early as 1930 (and the 16th century person who tried to fill out a deciphering column on page f1r didn&#8217;t seem to do much better).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonah fowl</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/01/15/elmar-vogts-new-voynich-blog/comment-page-1#comment-12397</link>
		<dc:creator>jonah fowl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=634#comment-12397</guid>
		<description>Just an idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just an idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickpelling</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/01/15/elmar-vogts-new-voynich-blog/comment-page-1#comment-12395</link>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=634#comment-12395</guid>
		<description>Ah, the &quot;o kees chary ytaly alaly&quot; phrase. It&#039;s true that (e and i aside) there aren&#039;t many doubled letters in the VMs, and that this is one of the 354 instances where y is followed by y (only 40 of which are inside words, though). For comparison, there are only 26 -dd- instances in the VMs.

What I&#039;m trying to say is that the low instance count of &quot;yy&quot; falls well short of being enough evidence to say that y enciphers one of s/t/u. Sorry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, the &#8220;o kees chary ytaly alaly&#8221; phrase. It&#8217;s true that (e and i aside) there aren&#8217;t many doubled letters in the VMs, and that this is one of the 354 instances where y is followed by y (only 40 of which are inside words, though). For comparison, there are only 26 -dd- instances in the VMs.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m trying to say is that the low instance count of &#8220;yy&#8221; falls well short of being enough evidence to say that y enciphers one of s/t/u. Sorry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonah fowl</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/01/15/elmar-vogts-new-voynich-blog/comment-page-1#comment-12391</link>
		<dc:creator>jonah fowl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=634#comment-12391</guid>
		<description>in http://www.voynich.com/folios/f73v.jpg under the crossbowman there&#039;s a word &quot;9---99--9&quot;. I always wondered if 9&#039;s would have been s,t, and u. So it would be simple cipher with offset in sections.It is simple enuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in <a href="http://www.voynich.com/folios/f73v.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.voynich.com/folios/f73v.jpg</a> under the crossbowman there&#8217;s a word &#8220;9&#8212;99&#8211;9&#8243;. I always wondered if 9&#8242;s would have been s,t, and u. So it would be simple cipher with offset in sections.It is simple enuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Welcome to the whacky world of Wilfrid Voynich&#8230; &#171; Thoughts about the Voynich Manuscript</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/01/15/elmar-vogts-new-voynich-blog/comment-page-1#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>Welcome to the whacky world of Wilfrid Voynich&#8230; &#171; Thoughts about the Voynich Manuscript</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=634#comment-930</guid>
		<description>[...] thereafter (obviously, else it would be an event of the future) Nick Pelling wrote a very kind review about my blog. He even went as far as calling me &#8220;a friend&#8221;, regardless of the fact [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thereafter (obviously, else it would be an event of the future) Nick Pelling wrote a very kind review about my blog. He even went as far as calling me &#8220;a friend&#8221;, regardless of the fact [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickpelling</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/01/15/elmar-vogts-new-voynich-blog/comment-page-1#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator>nickpelling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=634#comment-856</guid>
		<description>Good question! But rather than squeeze the reply into this small margin, I&#039;ve posted it as a continuation here:-

http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/01/17/german-zodiac-woodcuts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question! But rather than squeeze the reply into this small margin, I&#8217;ve posted it as a continuation here:-</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/01/17/german-zodiac-woodcuts" rel="nofollow">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/01/17/german-zodiac-woodcuts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infinitii</title>
		<link>http://www.ciphermysteries.com/2009/01/15/elmar-vogts-new-voynich-blog/comment-page-1#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>infinitii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciphermysteries.com/?p=634#comment-828</guid>
		<description>&quot;...for the Sagittarius page, for example, how it was suggested long ago that the zodiac motifs might well have largely been copied from a (probably 14th century?) German woodcut calendar...&quot;

Do you have any sort of cite for this? I&#039;m assuming it&#039;s from the mailing list, but I can&#039;t find it using any combination of search terms. My own theory about the Voynich involves German illustrations, and this could be immensely helpful to me if you can recall where you heard about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;for the Sagittarius page, for example, how it was suggested long ago that the zodiac motifs might well have largely been copied from a (probably 14th century?) German woodcut calendar&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you have any sort of cite for this? I&#8217;m assuming it&#8217;s from the mailing list, but I can&#8217;t find it using any combination of search terms. My own theory about the Voynich involves German illustrations, and this could be immensely helpful to me if you can recall where you heard about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

